A great example of the "derivative atomization" strategy employed at AudioEye.

The 2026 Web Accessibility Litigation Report was a gargantuan piece of many data points. Most relevant to our buying audience were the insights surrounding E-commerce businesses. I quickly worked to create a shorter, easily digestible version of the full report aimed toward our E-commerce ICP. While the full version of the report lends AudioEye authority and credibility, the shorter "atomized" pieces act as more direct guides to specific audiences.

This was a herculean effort that came from one of AudioEye's biggest content pain points: not owning our own data.

Whenever we referred to the legal landscape of digital accessibility, competitor statistics were the only source we had.

I engaged in a "brain-trust" style collaboration (a la Pixar Studios) across multiple teams to bring this to life. Through our legal team, I gained access to a public domain platform to parse through web accessibility lawsuits. I spent some quality time vibe-coding with AI to generate a python program that would parse through all relevant cases and export a spreadsheet. Then, I analyzed the results and created a narrative surrounding the numbers. Finally, I worked with our wonderful design team to bring this report of AudioEye owned data to life.

Guide for SaaS ICP, accessibility guide for securing contracts.

A guide geared toward UX/designer ICP, adding value from AudioEye on digital accessibility basics.

Digital accessibility breakdown for buyers, comparing options and positioning AudioEye.

Ecommerce-specific guide to integrating digital accessibility practices to your online shop.